Legislature(1999 - 2000)

03/02/2000 01:40 PM Senate L&C

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
txt
                                                                                                                                
             SB 279-REDEMPTION OF CORPORATE SHARES                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
CHAIRMAN MACKIE announced SB 279 to be up for consideration.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
MR. DAVID GREY, Aide to Senate Labor and Commerce, said SB 279 is                                                               
an act related to redemption of shares of certain Alaskan                                                                       
corporations.  It allows the redemption of preferred stock at the                                                               
discretion of the stock holder.  By providing this option, Alaska                                                               
corporations are given an alternative method to raise funds and                                                                 
Alaskan investors are given an expanded investment opportunity.                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
As the Alaskan Corporate Code stands now, redemption of preferred                                                               
shares is only at the option of the issuer.  The right to have                                                                  
stock redeemed under specific conditions can be an important aspect                                                             
for a stock sale or transaction.  This share redemption right gives                                                             
the shareholder an avenue to get the holder's cash back under terms                                                             
negotiated with the issuing corporation.                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Under this bill, preferred stock share redemption must also comply                                                              
with other restrictive provisions of the Corporate Code.  For                                                                   
example, a redemption is prohibited if the amount of the                                                                        
corporation's retained earnings immediately before the proposed                                                                 
distribution does not equal or exceed the amount of the proposed                                                                
distribution. "You've got to have enough money to pay everybody                                                                 
off."                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
The Alaska Corporate Code is modeled in large part after the                                                                    
California Corporation Code.  This body of law has since been                                                                   
amended and expanded to allow for this kind of stock redemption.                                                                
A number of other states have also allowed the issuance of                                                                      
preferred stocks similar to what is being proposed by this bill.                                                                
                                                                                                                                
MR. TERRY ELDER, Director, Division of Banking, Securities, and                                                                 
Corporations testified that a number of other states already allow                                                              
this option to corporations.  It wouldn't have any fiscal impact on                                                             
his department in terms of filing requirements.  They agree that                                                                
there are other sections of the Corporation Code that provide                                                                   
adequate security for shareholders so that they wouldn't be                                                                     
financially harmed by redemptions.  Consequently, it just becomes                                                               
a public policy issue for the legislature to decide.                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CHAIRMAN MACKIE asked what other states do.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
MR. ELDER answered that California, in particular, which our Code                                                               
was based on, and a number of other states have already amended                                                                 
their acts to allow for this option.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
CHAIRMAN MACKIE asked if he saw any public policy reasons or                                                                    
downside why they should continue to deny that option.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
MR. ELDER said he didn't.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Number 411                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR LEMAN asked if he would recommend to the Governor that he                                                               
sign this.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR. ELDER responded that he was not taking a position on the bill,                                                              
but, if the bill passes the legislature, and the Governor asks the                                                              
Commissioner, and the Commissioner asks him, he couldn't see any                                                                
reason why he wouldn't recommend it.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR KELLY asked who requested it.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
CHAIRMAN MACKIE answered that the Labor and Commerce Committee                                                                  
introduced it at the request of some companies.  He thought GCI was                                                             
one.                                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Number 477                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
MR. JULIUS BRECHT, Attorney and Managing Shareholder of the Law                                                                 
firm Wolforth, Bachelor, Johnson, and Brecht, said he was a past                                                                
Director of the Alaska Division of Banking, Securities, and                                                                     
Corporations. He said he had submitted a written statement in                                                                   
support of this bill which they should already have.  He summarized                                                             
his statement saying that he participated in the development and                                                                
review of proposals for a new Alaska Corporate Code.  As                                                                        
comprehensive as that effort was, time marches on and corporate law                                                             
needs change.  Redemption of shares is an example.  The proposed                                                                
changes to section .325 do not lessen the provisions in the Code                                                                
for protection of shareholders of a corporation.  They will allow                                                               
greater flexibility to a corporation's board of directors in                                                                    
addressing capital needs in the present day financial markets.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
MR. JIMMY JACKSON, GCI, said their chief financial officer, John                                                                
Lowe, has submitted testimony in support of SB 279.  Since he is                                                                
traveling today, Mr. Jackson said he was here to reiterate his                                                                  
testimony and answer questions.  Several other states, including                                                                
those who are leaders in corporate law like Delaware, already allow                                                             
preferred stock which is redeemable in this way at the option of                                                                
the shareholder.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
GCI is an Alaskan corporation, founded by Alaskans, and is one of                                                               
the few publicly traded corporations.  Unfortunately, they are at                                                               
a disadvantage because they cannot issue preferred stock which is                                                               
redeemable at the option of the shareholder.  This is a                                                                         
disadvantage to them in trying to raise capital to conduct their                                                                
business.  Without this law, businesses will be less inclined to                                                                
incorporate in Alaska and more inclined to incorporate in another                                                               
state.                                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
MR. DAVID TAYLOR, Chief Financial Officer, Grady and Company, a                                                                 
privately held insurance brokerage,  supported SB 279 for many of                                                               
the same reasons that have already been stated.  By enabling                                                                    
Alaskan corporations to remain competitive with other states in the                                                             
raising of capital, this is a revenue positive bill for the State                                                               
and will result in additional taxable income.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CHAIRMAN MACKIE asked if there was anyone else to testify and                                                                   
getting no response he closed the pubic testimony.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR LEMAN thanked him for introducing this legislation.  It was                                                             
good and timely.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR KELLY commented that he wasn't sure of that since they had                                                              
the bill only ten days and had heard from only one corporation.  He                                                             
would like to believe that. He wanted to hear if there is another                                                               
side of the story.  He wanted to hear that, too.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
CHAIRMAN MACKIE responded that the bill was scheduled twice and the                                                             
same people had testified.  He asked Mr. Grey if there was any                                                                  
opposition to the bill.  He indicated there was none.  He asked                                                                 
Senator Kelly if he wanted to hold the bill and he indicated no.                                                                
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR KELLY said this appears to be a major change in the                                                                     
Corporate Code and he's not sure if the corporate world is aware of                                                             
that, yet.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
SENATOR LEMAN moved to pass SB 279 from committee.  There were no                                                               
objections and it was so ordered.                                                                                               

Document Name Date/Time Subjects